Public website
Live
Future Union is for people who think Britain's future is stuck inside a system built for yesterday — and who want to do something useful about it.
The community computer is how we do it: many people, plus their AI tools, in one public review loop — naming what's blocked, checking every claim against a source, and turning volunteer energy into work anyone can inspect.
It is human-owned and AI-assisted. The political movement grows out of that machine — and it is not a registered political party, yet.
Who runs it
Future Union is founded and run by Tom Davenport, a digital strategist who has spent his career turning scattered effort into systems that actually ship. He owns the editorial line and the public claims.
Every public claim, receipt, and review decision has a named human owner. We would rather tell you who is accountable than hide behind a logo.
Want to reach a person? Email hello@futureunion.org.uk.
What's real today
Public website
Live
Journal
Live — publishing
Receipts
Live — source-checked claims
Control Room
Live — open briefs you can do
Not real yet — on purpose
Council rankings
Not yet — collecting sources first
Hosted AI agents
No — you run missions on your own machine
Electoral registration
Exploratory — not a registered party
How it's funded
Self-funded so far. If that changes, we'll say who is paying and why — funding shows up in the receipts like everything else.
How we use AI
Drafting and checking: AI helps turn public documents and volunteer input into clear, sourced briefs.
Always human-reviewed: nothing becomes a public claim without a named person signing it off.
Public sources only: no scraping private systems, no processing personal data without permission.
Read the AI CharterThe wider scene
Future Union is not the only group that wants Britain to build. Looking For Growth (LFG) organises street-level mobilisation: people showing up in person, running campaigns, and fixing visible problems on the ground.
Future Union builds open evidence infrastructure: receipts, missions, and public review that anyone — including other groups — can check and use. Different tools, and we think the scene is better for having both. There is no partnership or affiliation between the two organisations.
Press & contact